Almost a decade has elapsed since a small group
of West Berkeley residents living around the city's Corporation Yard
came together to protest the impacts of the vehicle maintenance facility
on the community. This public outcry was directed towards the maintenance
facility's traffic, fueling Station, and the almost complete absence
of any environmental protections.
Topping the list of community concerns were issues of
air quality, chemicals and hazardous waste storage, and storm water
pollution controls. Public Works argued that management was actually
environmentally pro-active and blamed the operational impacts on the
rundown eighty-year old facility. However, local residents found out
firsthand that the facility's age was just part of the problem.
In April 1992, while on a tour of the facility, the community
witnessed a street sweeper illegally dumping the liquid portion of its
street collection into the Yard's storm drain, a clear violation of
the Clean Water Act. This public incident, though quite embarrassing
for city staff, reinforced the neighborhood's contention that the time
had come for changes in both the facility and its municipal maintenance
activities.
Over the next several years, Public Works met regularly
with the neighbors to address the operations of the vehicle facility.
However, few changes actually occurred. Residents should have realized
early on in the community process that the Yard meetings were being
used to silence public discussion.
Neighborhood involvement was reduced to little more than
a series of public relations meetings while Public Works waited politely
for residents to talk themselves out and go away. And so they did, but
the environmental compliance problems remained.
The 1992 sweeper dumping incident also revealed to the
community that such Corporation Yard activities require a Federal discharge
permit. Moreover, Berkeley was, and is, a member of Alameda County's
storm water program. One of the program's central components is that
of municipal maintenance activities and best management practices for
environmental protection. The county program responded by both reprimanding
Berkeley and encouraging the city to move forward in modernizing its
maintenance operations. The choice, since that time, has been Berkeley's.
Unfortunately, the city's choice, like other county storm
water members, has been to view this area of Capital Improvement as
a very low priority. This has only reinforced public criticism that
the county's storm water program amounts to little more than revenue
enhancement for the city.
Two weeks ago, the Corporation Yard was cited for polluting
the storm drains in the Yard. The Notice of Violation made public the
fact that there had been prior notices for corrective actions dating
as far back as 1995. The citation, written on a rainy day, was linked
directly to the antiquated and inadequate protection and containment
of sand, asphalt, hazardous wastes, equipment and contaminated soils
on site. It should be noted that the Yard's EBMUD discharge permit is
currently out of compliance for this same reason. From a management
perspective, this long-term Public Works failure to comply with environmental
regulations is outrageous.
Last November, Berkeley's Public Works celebrated being
the first city in the state to receive an accreditation for excellence
by the Public Works Association. It's not surprising that the accreditation
team, as it toured the Corp Yard, apparently overlooked these obvious
shortcomings. It should be remembered that environmental protection
is a relatively new mandate for Public Works activities here and across
the nation.
The time has come to fully capitalize an upgrade
of Corp Yard activities and storage areas. Let's do it right. Being
responsive to environmental protection and compliance requires real
commitment and cash. It's really not an option. Today, it's the law! By L A Wood, Berkeley Daily Planet, June 2, 2001 Corp yard still noisy, polluting
Environmental compliance
From: Unified Program Section California Environmental Protection Agency
To: L A Wood, April 17, 2002 Re: Complaint over Cupa enforcement practices
News
Articles about Berkeley Corporation Yard
- Corporation Yard area to
stay intact
Devona Walker, Berkeley Daily Planet, July 5, 2002
- Corporation Yard needs
more than just a makeover
L A Wood, Berkeley Daily Planet, February 21, 2002
- Corp yard still noisy, polluting
L A Wood, Berkeley Daily Planet, June 2, 2001
- Residents Miffed with Allston
Way Corporation Yard
Juliet Leyra, Berkeley Daily Planet, November 24,
2000
- Residents Gather, Voice
Qualms Regarding Yard
Gagan Nanda, Daily Californian, November 22, 2000
- Officials Order City Gas
Tank Shut
Marc Albert, Berkeley Voice, November 26, 1998
- Activist lauded for raising
awareness
Marc Albert, Berkeley Voice, June 18, 1998
- Neighborhood Welcome Corporation
Yard Sound Wall
Will Harper, Berkeley Voice, September 21, 1995
- Neighbor's Video Reveals
Problems at City Yard
William Brand, Oakland Tribune, March 19, 1995
- Corpyard Cleanup May Wait
for Advanced Technology
Shannon Morgan, Berkeley Voice, September 9, 1993
- Neighbors to city: clean
up! Sloppiness at city maintenance yard provokes local ire
Karen Armstead, Daily Californian, May 26, 1993
- In praise of Berkeley:
City actually listened to group's complaints about noise and toxins
William Brand, Oakland Tribune, May 22, 1993
- Sound Protest
William Brand, Oakland Tribune, September 25, 1992
- City site laced with toxic
waste
Andrew Brandt, Daily Californian, April 21, 1992
- Corporation Yard Hazardous
Materials & Air Quality Report
- Corporation Yard needs
more than just a makeover
L A Wood, Berkeley Daily Planet February 21, 2002
|
Ratcliff building at Corporation Yard Landmark Information
- Corporation Yard area to stay intact
Devona Walker, Berkeley Daily Planet, July 5, 2002
- LANDMARK APPLICATION
|