Callaghan Hall Proposed as New Toxic
Waste Site: Strawberry Canyon Secondary Option
Miranda Leitsinger, Daily Californian, September 20, 1994
The debate over the location of UC Berkeley's new toxic
waste facility has taken a new turn with a university proposal
that Callaghan Hall may be the best place to store as hazardous materials.
"We are looking closer at the feasibility of the
Callaghan Hall site," said Katherine Mortimer, a senior planner
with the office of physical and environmental planning.
"We are taking another step in the level of analysis,"
she added. "It seems it might be able to work."
Callaghan Hall currently houses the Reserve Officers Training
Corps and is located next to the campus heating plant. If selected as
the new site, Callaghan would house low-level radioactive waste and
unwanted chemicals generated by the campus.
Some people have questioned whether the Callaghan site
is safe because it is in the middle of a populated campus.
But Susan Spencer, director of the university's office
of environment, health and safety, said a study has shown that regardless
of where an alternate facility would be located, the "potential
for release and exposure is very small."
Consequently, "this discovery has led to open up
additional sites for the facility," she said. The search for alternate
sites comes 20 years after the university began operating the Canyon
Chemical Facility in the hills above Memorial Stadium. The facility,
which is home to 110 tons of toxic waste each year, can no longer handle
the volume and types of toxic waste.
The focus on Callaghan comes as an about-face after a
year of serious consideration of a site in Strawberry Canyon for UC
Berkeley's new $9.5 million facility.
The university has encountered strong opposition to the
Strawberry Canyon site. Several environmental groups have formed a coalition
called BAC-OUT (Bay Area Coalition Opposed to UC Toxics), applying pressure
on the university to consider alternate sites.
L A Wood and Carolyn Erbele, two Berkeley activists who
are members of BAC-OUT, have produced a 13-minute video entitled, "Campus
Chemical Waste: Disaster in the Planning."
The video, which the activists debuted on Friday at City
Hall, raises questions about the canyon site because of its proximity
to the Hayward fault line -- just 1500 feet away ‹ and its location
in areas known for mudslides and fires.
Among those featured in the video is Berkeley Fire Chief
Gary Cates, who said the canyon site would be "contrary to the
efforts made by the city to mitigate fire hazards."
Meanwhile, university officials have ordered a further
study of the Callaghan site.
Although UC Berkeley was slated to make its recommendations
about a final site to the UC Board of Regents in January, it may take
longer before that happens, Mortimer said.
"If it gets to the point that we will offer Callaghan
Hall as the site, (the recommendation) will be delayed."
Wood and Erbele are planning to show their video at the
Sept. 27 meeting of the Berkeley City Council.
Two public hearings about the university's draft
environmental impact report -- which includes the canyon and Callaghan
Hall sites -- have been scheduled for Sept. 29. The hearings will take
place in the International House at 4 p.m. and 7 p.m.